9 Months Pregnant Stomach Sore To Touch

Tubone 800 outlets. At the expense of cervignanesi.

Laguna Treatment Consortium (commonly known as Tubone) recently sent to 800 cervignanesi a notification. Let's see together what the content of the letter. Tubone says (quoting accurately summarize):
"... Since that act in the public street facing the property (his property, ed) was carried out with the conduct of black water (...) connected to the centralized sewage San Giorgio di Nogaro, have been carried out on wells for connection to the sewer system until the limit of property, (...) according to art. 5, c. 6 of the Drainage Regulations, it is that within 3 months (...) must be submitted in connection (...) and the completion of the connection must be made within 2 years from the issuance of the opinion (of the Laguna Wastewater Association). " In Failure to comply with specific ordinances the City Council will intervene.
is up to us, the Tubone.

But the mayor, concerned about the tone "imperative" of the letter sent by Tubone, is careful to attach a letter-to reassure the community that wants (or at least try to) the 800 cervignanesi that will dip into their portfolio. Let us see what he says: "Dear citizens I write this letter to accompany and explain the notification ..." . Dear Paviotti, notification is clear and we understood the content immediately: within 3 months must apply for connection and within two years you have to finish the work. Otherwise the City will intervene with its order. The letter of Mayor, serpentine, traces some of the stages of age-old story, cites articles of the Law, the judgments of the Supreme Court. Then in the second half of the letter, anticipates three possible questions: "By when should I do?" As we had not yet understood, explains the demand for 3 months and 2 years for the completion of the works ... otherwise it must intervene with a special order of the City. We understand. Paviotti, we understand.

But perhaps more interesting question is the third (it seems that questioning itself Paviotti): "Why should I do now?" and ventures into personal interpretations citing regulations now that would make "inescapable obligation of the connections." goes on to say (be careful, because this is a very important step): "... recall that in this regard in the past expressed support for myself I had the opportunity to not require an immediate execution (...) to avoid a substantial cost even for families. "

Think about those words " ... to avoid a significant cost for families .... "

1) If the cost was relevant then, it will be even more relevant today. O considers Mr. Mayor, that the costs are somewhat reduced over time? Or maybe it feels, the mayor, that the best time to ask this further heavy sacrifice, and today, with many families already devastated by the effects of an unprecedented economic crisis?
2) But still: p hy the Tubone has not notified the requirement of connection in recent years when the art. 6, which included a charge to the citizens of just € 258 was in force? For example, note that if your connection cost € 1,000, at your expense it remained only 258. The other 742 paid them the Tubone. It cost € 2,000? You always and you paid only 258, the other, put them on Tubone.
And now, dear readers, we salute you with a question (and answer).

know when it was removed the provision contained in legislation. 6 (one of the 258 €)? On October 2, 2009, just over a year ago. But only today Tubone sends out letters with the requirement of connection.

E Paviotti innocently asks "Why should I do now?".

Bravo, they ask us too.

The Altrametà

Fake Community Service Hours School

School, Via Udine, Via Public Domain Parking e. .. abandonment of a minor.

Remember the million dollar expenditure for the upgrading of the car park off Federal property? Do you remember the intent to eliminate the congestion of school buses from transit Via Leonardo da Vinci (the middle school in Via Udine?). Do you remember all the proclamations of the Executive, in the aftermath of this revolution? But then, remember the history of the school to which children should always be accompanied and taken from an adult (or you hear hear-speak-of abandonment of a minor?). Well whisk it all together, heat over low heat and ... these are the results.

1) Just to improve traffic flow (as advocated by this Government), every morning the entrance to Via L. da Vinci ban with a nice fence adjoining the road closes to traffic from 7.45 to 8.15 and then from 12.45 to 13.15 (at all, even to residents). The school bus arrived at around 08.00 am, in perfect solitude, unload students in front of the entrance gate of the school. The students, down from a port ( the school) and come to school using vacuum (virtually) all corridors that are seen retractable airports. A magic number. There is no abandonment of a minor.

2) When they leave, however (at around 13.00), despite Via L. Da Vinci always remain closed (including residents), students walking along (alone!-Hear-hear) the distance that separates them from school to park in Via Public Domain. Alone. Without net and unaccompanied. But excuse me ... and the abandonment of a minor? Second magic. Some municipal office (one, actually) has assured us in that case (the guys who leave the school alone, perhaps to head for somewhere ...) you do not configure the cases of child abandonment. Commonly translated: "So we are right: after all, who cares cce?".

3) But let's move on. Once accessed via State Property, climb on the school (by themselves) begin the journey back home, but to stop, or there is someone to receive them (a parent, friend, relative, an uncle of America ...) or remains on the school bus. Recluse. Three magic? No, great hold for a ride. He, who a few minutes the first had done alone (alone !!!), unaccompanied, the distance that exists between middle school and park in via Federal property, now can not get off the school bus if there is someone waiting for him. And maybe his house is there, in front of you.

One of our observant reader who alerted us to the curious (or pity?) Each other, you and asks: "We spent a lot of money, arguing, among other reasons, public that this work would have finally solved the problem of traffic around Via Udine in connection to entry / exit students from the schools, and now ... now tell us that there is the problem of child abandonment. It was not logical to think about first? And the roads, paradoxically, is deteriorated. Congratulations.

The Altrametà

Does Syphilischancre Become Black

Crematorium. But we really need? Rigotti wrote to the mayors of cervignanese.

Here is the full text of the letter from our parent company, Alberto Rigotti, the mayors of the association between local cervignanese on the crematorium ...

Preg.mo Mayor

Mario Piscitelli Romulus

at Municipal

Piazza Municipio, 1

33059 Villa Vicentina (UD)

Preg.mo Mayor

Ennio Scridel

at Municipal

Via Gramsci, 8

FIUMICELLO 33050 (UD)

Preg.mo Mayor

Palmina Mian

at Municipal

via Mosettig, 2

RUDA 33050 (UD)

Preg.mo Mayor

Michele Tibaldi

at Municipal

away June 2, 22

THIRD 33,050 of Aquileia (UD)

Preg.mo Mayor

Alviano Scarel

Town Hall

Piazza Garibaldi, 7

33051 Aquileia (UD)

Preg.mo Mayor

Giovanni Luigi Cumin

at Municipal

Independence Square, 2

33040 CAMPOLONGO Tapogliano (UD)

Preg.mo Mayor

Peter Paviotti

at Municipal

Independence Square, 1

33052 CERVIGNANO DEL FRIULI (UD)

Cervignano del Friuli, October 14, 2010 there

Preg.issimi First Citizens Association Inter Cervignanese,

let me write and discomfort to express my concern and not deny it, all my disappointment, the way the story of the building (? !) crematorium was handled and managed in particular by the Mayor of my community, geom. Peter Paviotti.

For months all we heard and understood (even the citizens of muscles that have participated in midsummer evening meeting) that the future crematorium should cost less than EUR 1 million, money that comes to about 80% from the coffers of the region and the remaining 20% \u200b\u200bfrom that of common Inter-Association.

Not even 15 days ago, the city council in Cervignano del Friuli, the second surprise. Paviotti The mayor, who presented the plan to the Council for approval, he spoke of an investment of € 3 million to develop a draft project financing does not currently exist (?!??), Paviotti always says so, private stakeholders in the initiative.

The first surprise was already consumed in the days prior to the City Council, analyzing the documents by which the Administration Paviotti brought to the Council the draft of the crematorium. The documents take account of data analysis very old (at least 10 years), there is a shred of current analysis, does not take into account "relevant market", there are no numbers, in fact there is nothing that allows a public administrator to make choices in the interest and good of the community it represents. Without going into the merits of the then criteria for choosing the site ... one for all: the proximity of the hospital crematorium Palmanova (sic ?!?!).

I am writing to ask, very simply, some questions:

• the our communities really need a crematorium?
• but the crematorium will cost € 844 000 € or 3 million?
• all together when you asked for the contribution to the Region FVG imagined a crematorium to be 3 million or € 844 000 and above the Friuli Venezia Giulia and asked what was said?
• is true that there was a private agreement (with the "blessing" of the Regional Council and the then Regional Minister Travanut Mauro Franco Iacop) which provided for the construction of the crematorium in the town of San Lorenzo rivulet and the election of a new mayor of that community has meant that the construction site was located in the town of Cervignano del Friuli?
• believe that a new crematorium in Cervignano del Friuli is a good investment in the sense that economic management can not produce at least loss of balance?

And when you answer, please also listen to my heartfelt invitation. Today the crematorium is not a priority and is not supporting the initiative in terms of purely economic . I know that most of you first citizens to whom I am paying, politically you're not part of my deployment, but the more why you should appreciate and take into account that it is my appeal to you face, now that the mayor of my community is deaf to every call and runs for some time now that roads have nothing to do with the general interest of the community and its citizens.

I think all together with the Region, and this is my total commitment, we seek to address the contribution already being allocated to build the crematorium to initiatives that truly cater to our community, I decided to develop bike lanes, I think to investment in the environmental or energy improvement of public buildings, I think. ... on this you are definitely much better than me.

I know that yesterday, Thursday, as you have gathered Association Inter-Cervignanese I consider a great, intelligent and profitable way to bring together the forces for good of our fellow citizens-to discuss the draft of the crematorium. I hope you have done for the last time in that hope, and hope to shelve the project, my hope comes from the depths of my soul. Works like the crematorium, if made, are expected to remain for many decades, your and our choices sometimes fall on future generations, it is definitely a crematorium, in fact it could be, I hope the end will not be.

Thank you for your patience, for the time you spent reading this simple letter, sorry if I have caused trouble, I did only for the love of our land and our communities.

Sincerely

Alberto Rigotti