Can My Friend Watch Bangbros

Paviotti Tubone and CAFC on the evening: the proposals of the opposition are delusional.

"Criticism of meetings organized by the opposition is good. Provided, however, that there is at least involved. "

And 'this, in essence, the emphasis moved from opposition leader Alberto Rigotti, regarding intervention in the local press that the mayor Paviotti considered "... this proliferation of initiatives, a real delirium in which each proposed exemptions, subsidized loans, technical house, reimbursements." So much for the thought-Paviotti delusions.

But Rigotti continues: "It is not the first time that the opposition calls on citizens to face different themes. On Tubone in particular, we have overcome the inertia of Paviotti Autoconvocate to 2 times the City Council in special session. And the very acid attack Paviotti now on the ropes, is weak for at least five reasons. "

1. Critical contents of a meeting which did not participate . If there was a mole, then its not only suffering from myopia, also had big problems with hearing. The hall was packed, the calm debate, the table of politics was equally divided between representatives of both sides. None of propaganda or demonstration, then.
2. However, Paviotti claims to have explained everything in a "very clear" letter sent to the recipients of the notification to the connection Tubone. We ask ourselves, but if the letter was so clear, why after nearly five months, 579 reports received on to as many families, only 90 of these respondents ? The Mayor was very informative and explanatory enough?
3. For this reason, we required the presence of some technical temporary the CAFC to help citizens in difficulty (there are) the formalities for applying for the connection. It 's really a proposal unreasonable?
4. Paviotti then consider the proposal made delirious by the opposition on the bill in installments of the total reported mains. And 'what is already a long time, for example, Bluenergy (known to be a partner in the City) for the replacement of boilers or installing air conditioners. You change the boiler and the total price to pay in installments with the bill. Our proposal is basically the same. Maybe that Bluenergy raves?
5. We have formulated proposals for financing and advice during the city council on January 3, 2011. While Paviotti had already branded as preposterous, the majority Travanut adviser and considered worthy of study , said the suspension of the vote pending further study, leaving the mayor with the task of verifying the feasibility of the proposals. The minutes of the testimony. Even Travanut raves?

conclusion. As required not so much by the opposition or Travanut, but from the entire City Council Cervignano not know if the proposals have been made in the appropriate or during the meeting and recalled by Paviotti held in San George on February 17? And 'know if case studies similar to those mentioned by the opposition, For example, for Via Stazione, Via III th Army (appropriation of pumps to fill the unevenness between sewers and drains of the houses) were made on the technical tables?

Being practical solutions in direct support of the citizens, but with the defect have been proposed by the opposition, it's no accident that were trashed by our mayor just because they did not have its imprimatur? The

Altrametà