Barwick Grandfather Clock Model 4878

House of Music? Like a Ferrari pedal ...

Remember the House of Music? D oveva be inaugurated in 2009. Then in April of this year ... then again in September ... it seemed that December is the date final. But nothing, nothing yet ...

Someone wants us to believe that the continued postponement of the opening day of the House of Music is due to the time needed for completion of the furniture and the layout of the rooms. The truth is that this delay was due to heavy dramatic understatements and design errors related to the acoustic insulation of the building.

In the course of a few "test" conducted to assess the acoustic structure and the isolation of a millionaire, there have been some embarrassing situations to say the least. Inside House of Music can be heard clearly the cars parked in the space behind the doors closing, people talking. And we're talking about sounds completely normal and predictable in an urban environment like the one in which the property is located.

But the problem may be very marginal and insignificant, if it were a warehouse for agricultural implements, or if the structure is not cost nearly 2 million € uro and if the 'sound insulation was not included as a priority in the Acoustic Report was an integral part of the Final Design / Executive.

I quote: This report "the purpose specify and define the acoustic measures to help ensure the correct use of the premises and in particular an optimal use of space" ... "In particular, the issues considered are the following: Checking the value of sound insulation between the building and outside."

During the now famous "test" has been able to verify that the House of Music is inexplicably permeable when the bells of the nearby cathedral and the roar of airplanes flying over the skies of our city. It is not really the maximum for a structure that would rank among the best recording studios entire region Friuli Venezia Giulia.

Unfortunately, the problem of sound insulation also affects the interior of the House of Music: in fact, even the rehearsal would not be adequately isolated from each other and, therefore, during the registration would not be possible to use both spaces for music and, even during the simple tests, would enter the rooms conflicting.

If we consider that the report states: "The choice of material was made according to the characteristics of absorbing" and "all the structures of separation between these local have been studied from the standpoint of their ability to sound insulation and have been prepared of specific "packages" of sound insulation, to comic are final.

If there is a similarity allowed, it would be like buying a Ferrari, but pedal.

Epper, and for a Ferrari Pedal for a House of Music vulnerable to the sound of the bells of the cathedral or a door slamming in the parking lot, 2 million € uro seem a bit 'too much.

Also because they are all money cervignanesi.

The Altrametà

How To Make A Room Divider

Photovoltaics: our proposal.

The fact

Our City spends astonishing figures for ' electricity needed to requirements linked to the consumption of its users (offices, schools, sports facilities, lighting, etc.).. just think that the last three years, things went like this:

year 2008 was spent on the "electricity" € 392,112.65;

414,987.70 in 2009 €;

for the year 2010 (until August / September 2010): € 277,834.56.

data (officers) are derived from the sum of the invoice for the billing period and amount, in the period not yet concluded, to over 1.1 million.

Opportunity

For some years there are interesting government incentives for energy saving and for the production of clean energy. Among the various facilities there is also the one on the installation of photovoltaic systems, consisting of panels to transform solar energy directly into electricity without any polluting emissions. The contributions are substantial.

Protest

Yet despite this and despite the increased environmental awareness of citizens and the extraordinary opportunity offered by our legislation, our City has done little or nothing in this direction.

The proposal

Given the enormous cost burden on the municipal budget for the needs of electric and energy of our community (see above € Million ), our proposal is this: since the City Council and property owners that are well suited to the installation of systems with panels Photovoltaic power generation from renewable sources, we try to use them to produce clean energy and reduce the costs of 'municipal energy bill "

Implementation

Look at the Sports Palace. It has a flat, free of over 1,500 square meters.

Now, consider the stock of municipal street from Riseris. It 's a big shed with a pitched roof in eternity.

This area of \u200b\u200bapproximately 3,500 sqm you can install about 400 kW peak. Given the exposure south-west and north-east slopes of the PV system that would help to create produce approximately 350,000 kWh per year.

value added

In the specific case (warehouse city), I get a double benefit because we would go to clean the surface completely replacing the asbestos roof (which would also allow an increase of 10% of the feed-in tariff for electricity produced by photovoltaic systems that will come into service after 31/12/2010).

The cost for the construction of that facility, including practices with the GSE, the design and incidental expenses is estimated at 1,400,000.00 Euro.

Even funding for the work you would have a full time return on investment estimated at about 10 years.

The investment pays for only

The mortgage payments would be covered almost entirely by the contribution paid by GSE against the energy produced and the municipal authority could use free energy from from the plant for their own use dramatically reducing the high costs incurred annually for the electricity bills.

future benefits

Since the contribution of twenty years after the conclusion of the amortization of the loan in the first ten years, the remaining 10 years would pure gain for the speaker municipal contributions to the net income collected and would continue to save the cost of the bill.

Specifically This proposal, signed by Rigotti and Balducci advisers, will be presented to the attention of the City Council at its next session.

The Altrametà

Recipies Fatty Liver Des

Paviotti to Rigotti: "... do not talk about issues that do not know ..." Rigotti answers ... And it gives

publish the open letter sent by the parent company to the Mayor Alberto Rigotti Peter Paviotti. For some time now and urgently, the mayor calls Rigotti "not to deal with issues that do not know." Last time, on the subject on the city streets. Here is the full text Rigotti that sent the mayor ...

I do not want food controversy at low cost, but I am compelled to speak because my silence does not pass to an attitude of embarrassment, difficulty, or even worse, to surrender.

E 'for some time that Paviotti is in the City Council that the press asks me not to deal with issues which would not be aware of: "Councillor Rigotti ago and the accountant should not deal with issues that do not know. ... "(cf. Messaggero Veneto of 11/18/2010).

assertion serious and disrespectful not only to the signed, but also against those who, mayors or administrators simple, despite the obvious, natural and other professions that are in daily exercise, commit themselves with passion, dedication and continuity in political administration in the service of their communities .

by the arrows fired from Paviotti would seem that only he, surveyor by profession, will be the sole repository of knowledge to enable them to expand in every field of human knowledge preaches without embarrassment of any school, health, economy and budget planning, environment, culture, health ...

Paviotti But he insists: "Rigotti Cervignano little lives and do not know that every day long queues formed at the intersection of the round ..." (again, see Messaggero Veneto 18/11 / 2010).

It 's true: my job takes me out often Cervignano, but for this I realize the traffic that grips my town. And, in very difficult times, I formulated the proposal that the construction of roundabouts, with costs totally sustainable, would make traffic more fluid movement and less heavy. The proposal, in accordance with the rules of sound and prudent management of public resources. I remember that occasion, the wry smile of incassai Paviotti that now, after three and a half years, announced that as its own proposal.

Before the construction of huge and expensive road works, it would be appropriate to await the construction of roundabouts (five on the main Venice-Trieste) and see if they can solve the traffic problem.

Then, I confirm: my career takes me often "out of town." But as everyone knows, I do not live in policy. I earn my bread and cover with working hard (but also with invaluable satisfaction), tasks in sports (professional and amateur with the same enthusiasm), within the university, with collaborations with other mayors from the region ... I think, in all humility, to be able to put these experiences to serve the community in which, Paviotti like it or not, live, live and work.

Following these tired and repetitive utterances of the Mayor, on reflection, I found myself faced with two possible solutions: the resignation of municipal council or attendance at an evening class for the attainment of a diploma surveyor. After a brief reflection and without delay, I opted for the latter. Receive his diploma in geometry as well as become proficient in each administrative area, who knows, bring me some advantage ...

With best regards

Alberto Rigotti

9 Months Pregnant Stomach Sore To Touch

Tubone 800 outlets. At the expense of cervignanesi.

Laguna Treatment Consortium (commonly known as Tubone) recently sent to 800 cervignanesi a notification. Let's see together what the content of the letter. Tubone says (quoting accurately summarize):
"... Since that act in the public street facing the property (his property, ed) was carried out with the conduct of black water (...) connected to the centralized sewage San Giorgio di Nogaro, have been carried out on wells for connection to the sewer system until the limit of property, (...) according to art. 5, c. 6 of the Drainage Regulations, it is that within 3 months (...) must be submitted in connection (...) and the completion of the connection must be made within 2 years from the issuance of the opinion (of the Laguna Wastewater Association). " In Failure to comply with specific ordinances the City Council will intervene.
is up to us, the Tubone.

But the mayor, concerned about the tone "imperative" of the letter sent by Tubone, is careful to attach a letter-to reassure the community that wants (or at least try to) the 800 cervignanesi that will dip into their portfolio. Let us see what he says: "Dear citizens I write this letter to accompany and explain the notification ..." . Dear Paviotti, notification is clear and we understood the content immediately: within 3 months must apply for connection and within two years you have to finish the work. Otherwise the City will intervene with its order. The letter of Mayor, serpentine, traces some of the stages of age-old story, cites articles of the Law, the judgments of the Supreme Court. Then in the second half of the letter, anticipates three possible questions: "By when should I do?" As we had not yet understood, explains the demand for 3 months and 2 years for the completion of the works ... otherwise it must intervene with a special order of the City. We understand. Paviotti, we understand.

But perhaps more interesting question is the third (it seems that questioning itself Paviotti): "Why should I do now?" and ventures into personal interpretations citing regulations now that would make "inescapable obligation of the connections." goes on to say (be careful, because this is a very important step): "... recall that in this regard in the past expressed support for myself I had the opportunity to not require an immediate execution (...) to avoid a substantial cost even for families. "

Think about those words " ... to avoid a significant cost for families .... "

1) If the cost was relevant then, it will be even more relevant today. O considers Mr. Mayor, that the costs are somewhat reduced over time? Or maybe it feels, the mayor, that the best time to ask this further heavy sacrifice, and today, with many families already devastated by the effects of an unprecedented economic crisis?
2) But still: p hy the Tubone has not notified the requirement of connection in recent years when the art. 6, which included a charge to the citizens of just € 258 was in force? For example, note that if your connection cost € 1,000, at your expense it remained only 258. The other 742 paid them the Tubone. It cost € 2,000? You always and you paid only 258, the other, put them on Tubone.
And now, dear readers, we salute you with a question (and answer).

know when it was removed the provision contained in legislation. 6 (one of the 258 €)? On October 2, 2009, just over a year ago. But only today Tubone sends out letters with the requirement of connection.

E Paviotti innocently asks "Why should I do now?".

Bravo, they ask us too.

The Altrametà